Friday, August 22, 2008

recent reading: the queen's daughter



title: the queen's daughter
author: melissa mccormick
purpose for reading: book club book selected by theresa
copyright: 2004
pages: 113
chapters: 21
review: the queen's daughter is an autobiographical story of melissa mccormick's ghastly 12 hours spent in detroit in 1976.  out for a night on the town with her friends, melissa was kidnapped, beaten and raped by several men after her car broke down on a detroit freeway.  the experience was so bad that at one point she begged them to kill her.  luckily, they didn't and she was set free the next morning.  melissa decided years later to write about her ordeal and how life changed for her after suffering through and surviving a woman's worst nightmare.  
it was very important to melissa that she not exploit her experience, but rather use it to inform other people.  however, after reading this book, i don't really understand what she was trying to accomplish.  maybe i've grown up desensitized to all the violence and horrible things in our society, but i don't think that this book was very helpful or inspirational to anyone who has been in a similar situation.  i can't speak from experience because thankfully, i've never experienced what melissa had to.  i think it's wonderful that she overcame a lot of what she was going through directly after, as well as years after her ordeal, but there really wasn't anything in this book that said "this is how i dealt with it and this is what may help you."  
rating: 2/5







Wednesday, August 13, 2008

recent reading: fake liar cheat


title: fake liar cheat
author: told goldberg
purpose for reading: fun
copyright: 2000
pages: 162
chapters: 21
review: i really didn't care for this book at all.  it really felt like the author was trying way to hard to be ironic and over used a dead-pan style of writing.  it felt like he was TRYING to be shocking, but i never bought it.  the premise for the book is that this regular joe [who somewhat lives the lifestyle of jack in fight club, i.e. being obsessed with buying things from ikea, not living life to the fullest] is approached by a beautiful girl who shows him the high-life in the l.a. scene.  the main thing that they do for fun is dine at fancy, upscale restuarants and skip out on the bill.  honestly, that really doesn't seem all too exciting to me.  
the beautiful woman, aka claire, has a nice car, apparently lives in a mansion, and dresses to the nines all the time.  the main character, lonnie, falls hard for her and loves what she brings out in him.  until she apparently performs a sexual favour for her boss.  lonnie then blackmails her boss by informing him that he will tell the boss' wife about his extramarital activities.  the story just gets ridiculous here because apparently this totally improvised and impulsive blackmailing scheme causes claire's boss to commit suicide.  where the hell that comes from, i don't know.  i really don't think that a rich, successful person would respond to some young punk and his girlfriend blackmailing them by killing themselves.
then, in even more unbelievable scenarios to follow, claire disappears and lonnie discovers that she has framed him for murder.  oh and also, he develops a cult following from copy-cat dine n' dashers who call themselves "lonnie's army."  of course he had nothing to do with this so-called army of his and these people carry out horrible things in his name like setting a school bus on fire.  it's just really ridiculous.  there is no way that someone could go from skipping out on a dinner bill to being wanted for murder.  this story reeks of fight club and i really feel like goldberg was trying way too hard to imitate chuck palahniuk's biting writing style, but he has miserably failed.  in my opinion palahniuk is probably the best contemporary writer that i've read to date and to try to imitate him is like trying to imitate van gogh: there's only one.  as a writer, i understand being inspired by a fellow author, but trying to imitate someone usually just makes you a second-rate THEM instead of a first-rate YOU.  
if you're in the mood for something edgy, quirky, and full of black humor, save yourself and just read some chuck p.
rating: 1.5


Tuesday, August 5, 2008

the dark knight

the second installment of the new batman series has been a box-office blast and has beat out "the shawshank redemption" for the top spot on the best movies list on imdb.com.  if you're one of a few people who hasn't yet seen the film, be advised that some spoilers might be ahead.

there is no beating around the bush: heath ledger has completely stolen the show in the new batman film.  i have to start out by saying this because i can't wait to talk about his performance until later.  ledger's last performance [technically, i know that terry gilliam's the imaginarium of doctor parnassus will be his last performance, but he never finished shooting on that film] is UNREAL.  there is no way that you could look at ledger as the joker and see the charming young australian in "10 things i hate about you."  ...and that's not just because of the joker's grisly makeup.  ledger changes his voice, his mannerisms, and the way you view him for the role of the joker.  he does exactly what an amazing actor does to portray someone that is truly not themselves.  he makes himself completely unrecognizable to the point that you believe that the joker really does exist and that the city of gotham isn't fiction at all.  to be able to make something so real for an audience that is in actuality completely unreal is the essence of what an actor does and ledger nailed it 100%.  rumors of post-humus oscar nods have been surrounding ledger's performance and whether they are true or not, it is safe to say that ledger's portrayal of the joker was the greatest in his portfolio of work.  it's sad to think that he was becoming an exponentially better actor with each film he did and that we probably would have seen even more amazing roles from him if he had not passed away so young and suddenly.  

i have to tear myself away from thinking about ledger and how much i hate that he's gone and talk about the rest of the film because it's freaking awesome.  christian bale once again plays the best batman that we've ever seen [at least in my opinion].  the character of bruce wayne/batman develops nicely in "the dark knight" because we see that wayne understands what being a hero means.  he ends up sacrificing batman's non-homicidal image to take the fall for the murders committed by the white knight of gotham: the new d.a. harvey dent.  of course dent doesn't commit the murders until after half of his face is burned off as a result of the joker trying to kill him.  and then the joker pushing him over the edge into madness where dent becomes the villain two-face who is obsessed with fate and chance.  now, i've always hated aaron eckhart as an actor.  i'm not sure if it's the roles he plays or his acting.  my friend remy commented that possibly i don't like his large chin.  i don't think that's it.  but whatever it may be, roles or chin, i loved him in this movie.  i can't exactly pinpoint what i loved about him other than i think he played both harvey dent and then two-face exactly as i envision them.  

also adding to the greatness of "the dark knight" is the face that maggie gyllenhaal, whom i love, replaced katie holmes, whom i can't stand, in the role of bruce wayne's childhood friend/love interest rachel dawes.  comparing gyllenhaal to holmes is like comparing filet mignon to a hamburger.  gyllenhaal brings sexy swank to the character while still upholding dawes' fierce and unyielding call for justice in gotham.  even on the most basic level of appearance, gyllenhaal LOOKS like what you would imagine bruce wayne's love to look like.  no, she's not conventionally beautiful, but her inner beauty shines through.  wow, that was cheesy.  also, let's not forget that bruce wayne is a billionaire.  when he was a child, wouldn't it stand to reason that his closest friend would come from at least a little bit of money?  gyllenhaal has a "money" face while holmes just talks out the side of her mouth. seriously, what is that?  also, just as a sidebar, i think it was pretty neat how "the dark knight" sort of kept it in the family.  many of you may know that gyllenhaal's brother, the beautiful jake, is godfather to ledger's daughter matilda.  the gyllenhaals and ledger were a close-knit group so i think it was fitting that in ledger's last movie, he was among friends.

"the dark knight" also propels jim gordon's story line ahead as he finally becomes "commissioner gordon."  in the film, he's full of tricks that make him a great cop, even going so far as to fake his own death to be able to later catch the joker and once again help batman.  of course this backfires and results in rachel's death and the creation of two-face, but seriously gordon was just doing his job.  

"the dark knight" is full of themes: anarchy [thanks to the joker], fate, duality, and chance [upheld in a twisted way by two-face], the true meaning of being a hero [batman is criticized repeatedly but does what's right for gotham, even if it appears to hurt himself], and finally, i think it puts forth the lesson of not putting all your eggs in one basket.  gordon and batman put harvey dent up on a pedestal as the white knight of gotham.  they claim that dent is the real hero because he'll fight crime the way it's meant to be fought: through the legal system.  but after dent becomes two-face and murders five people, his white knight image would be ruined if the public found out about the murders.  gordon and batman admit that they were naive to think that one person could change gotham and that they didn't account for someone without rules or scruples [aka the joker].  when anarchy exists, even in crime, there is no way to fight back because there are no limits or boundaries set.  

the movie was amazing and if you haven't seen it, you should go NOW.  if you saw it and have an opinion about it, leave a comment!